All feedback will be investigated, but priority support, confidential support, and product priority updates are reserved for customers. Interested in becoming a customer? Subscribe here...
One of the features in our backlog is: optimizing for 1-phase commit (i.e., when only one resource is involved in the transaction).
However, the killer use case for Atomikos is precisely when 2 or more resources are needed. Consequently, we've always been reluctant to changing the design of our core algorithms to fully support 1-phase commit in all possible cases.
The question to you: what do you think? Should we invest in redesigning our core to go for 1-phase commit even when we think this is marginal?
It would only benefit in the following case:
-only one resource (DataSource/ConnectionFactory) is used in the transaction, AND
-at least one Synchronization is registered
In practice, this translates into:
-Using JTA with Hibernate and only having JDBC (no JMS) to one database.
This topic is archived. No further replies will be accepted.Other recent topics